Frontier model labs
Create large sets of interactive computer-use tasks for reinforcement learning, post-training, or evaluation.
Independent tool overview
Matrices is now an infrastructure company building realistic simulated computer environments for training and evaluating multimodal LLM agents. The original self-filling research spreadsheet described in older tool listings is no longer the product offered at Matrices.app.
Visit the official Matrices site ↗
Overview
Matrices builds what it describes as training environments for multimodal, computer-using agents. Instead of allowing a model to practice on live accounts and create real side effects, the company recreates websites, workflows, and surrounding context so an agent can attempt a task repeatedly and receive feedback inside a controlled simulation.
This is a substantial pivot from the earlier Matrices research tool, which was presented as an AI-powered spreadsheet that could gather and organize information. The current offering is aimed at frontier AI labs and agent-development teams, not analysts looking for a no-code spreadsheet or a public self-serve data-analysis app.
Use cases
The strongest fit depends on the job you need the product to complete, not the size of its feature list.
Create large sets of interactive computer-use tasks for reinforcement learning, post-training, or evaluation.
Test agents against realistic websites and multi-step workflows without touching real user or financial accounts.
Measure success, failure, recovery, and behavior over repeatable tasks with controlled starting states.
Produce trajectories and feedback from agents completing realistic interface tasks at scale.
Commission simulations for valuable domains that cannot safely or cheaply be exercised thousands of times in production.
Capabilities
Recreates the interfaces and state needed for an agent to perform realistic digital work without the real-world consequences.
Targets agents that must perceive screens and act through user interfaces rather than answer a single text prompt.
Lets teams rerun tasks from controlled conditions for training comparisons and regression evaluation.
Environments can define whether an attempt succeeded so learning systems can associate actions with outcomes.
The company's roadmap focuses on increasingly complex tasks that span multiple steps, sites, and decisions.
Matrices' engineering materials describe infrastructure for running many agent attempts with higher throughput and lower latency.
Internal tooling is designed to help analyze, create, and operate a growing library of agent challenges.
The team describes its broader technical goal as recreating the parts of the internet and workflows agents need to practice on.
Matrices has said it plans to open a level editor so external contributors can create simulated tasks, but public availability and terms are not yet published.
Process
Step 1
Identify a high-value computer task, its real systems, success criteria, and the side effects that make live practice unsafe.
Step 2
Define the interfaces, data, identities, dependencies, and hidden state the agent could plausibly encounter.
Step 3
Recreate the necessary websites and workflow behavior with enough depth that the agent can explore beyond one scripted path.
Step 4
Establish initial states, user instructions, acceptable outcomes, failure conditions, and machine-verifiable feedback where possible.
Step 5
Execute repeated attempts across models or checkpoints and collect actions, observations, errors, and results.
Step 6
Use the trajectories and rewards for post-training, then keep stable evaluation sets to detect overfitting and new failures.
Cost
Matrices does not publish self-serve plans or unit pricing. The current site routes prospective customers to direct contact, indicating a custom commercial engagement rather than a subscription an individual developer can buy online.
Custom
Commercial access for AI labs and agent teams is arranged directly with Matrices.
Custom
Environment creation is likely scoped around the websites, task complexity, graders, and scale the customer needs.
Not yet announced
Matrices has discussed opening environment creation to outside contributors, but access, compensation, and pricing are not public.
Pricing checked . Check current pricing at the source ↗
Assessment
Compare
The right alternative depends on the specific output, workflow, controls and budget your project requires.
Agents
Use Gemini Computer Use when you need a model designed to operate interfaces rather than infrastructure for training such a model.
Explore Gemini Computer Use →Agents
Use Manus Cloud Computer when the goal is deploying an always-on agent in a hosted environment instead of building RL simulations.
Explore Manus Cloud Computer →Agents
Use Perplexity Computer for a finished multi-model agent experience rather than custom agent-training environments.
Explore Perplexity Computer →Agents
Use Manus My Computer when you want an agent to work on a local desktop with user oversight.
Explore My Computer →Questions
Matrices now builds simulated training environments for multimodal LLM agents that perform realistic computer-use tasks. It sells to AI labs and agent-development teams rather than general spreadsheet users.
No. Older listings described a self-filling research spreadsheet, but the current Matrices.app site and company materials are about training environments for computer-use agents.
An agent may need thousands of attempts to improve. A simulation lets it practice workflows involving accounts, websites, files, or transactions without repeatedly changing a real system or affecting real people.
The current public site does not offer self-serve registration for the training product. Prospective customers are directed to contact the team.
Pricing is not publicly listed. Expect a custom enterprise or research engagement based on environment complexity, task volume, integrations, and operational scale.
Matrices describes itself as the environment layer for training computer-use agents. Customers should confirm model hosting, inference, runners, rewards, and training responsibilities in the engagement scope.
They can be useful for controlled comparison, but only if the simulation and grader reflect the real workflow. Teams should hold out tasks, test for environment shortcuts, and validate improvements in a safely limited real setting.
Matrices has said it plans to open a level editor to outside contributors. The company has not publicly documented general availability, pricing, or contributor terms, so it should be treated as a roadmap item.
Bottom line
Matrices is relevant to a narrow but important buyer: AI labs that need realistic, repeatable computer-use experience for agent training. Its pivot makes the old spreadsheet framing misleading. The current product looks like custom infrastructure, so buyers should evaluate environment fidelity, grader quality, portability, security, and evidence of real-world transfer before committing.
Visit Matrices website ↗
Get access to all our AI courses, hundreds of real-world AI use cases, live expert-led workshops, an exclusive network of AI early adopters, and more.
Get unlimited access to all of our current & upcoming industry-specific AI courses for the duration of your subscription.
To keep up with the rapid pace of AI, our team publishes AI implementation guides daily. Our library contains 300+ practical use cases to automate real-world work.
Join weekly, live, interactive sessions with industry leaders who are at the forefront of AI for hands-on implementation guidance and exclusive insights.
Network with an exclusive community of AI-first professionals who are working smarter with AI. Learn how early adopters are using AI in their work and businesses.