The Rundown AI homepage

Independent tool overview

Trinity-Large-Thinking at a glance

Trinity-Large-Thinking is Arcee AI's open-weight 398B sparse MoE reasoning model for tool calling, multi-step planning, coding, and long-running agent loops.

Visit the official Trinity-Large-Thinking site ↗
Trinity-Large-Thinking product preview
Developer
Arcee AI
Architecture
398B sparse MoE; about 13B active
Expert routing
4 of 256 experts plus 1 shared
Model context
Up to 512K tokens
OpenRouter context
262,144 tokens
Core capabilities
Reasoning, tool calling, and coding
License
OpenMDW-1.1
Languages listed
11

Overview

What Trinity-Large-Thinking is

Trinity-Large-Thinking is the reasoning-optimized checkpoint in Arcee AI's Trinity Large family. It has roughly 398 billion total parameters but activates about 13 billion per token through 4-of-256 expert routing, aiming to combine frontier-scale capacity with more efficient inference than a similarly sized dense model.

The model is post-trained with extended chain-of-thought and agentic reinforcement learning for multi-step planning, tool calling, coding, and customer-service-style workflows. It emits explicit reasoning in think blocks or a reasoning_content field, and Arcee warns that this reasoning must be preserved in message history for reliable multi-turn agent behavior.

Arcee's model card describes a 512K extended context window, while the current OpenRouter endpoint exposes 262,144 tokens. The downloadable weights use the permissive OpenMDW-1.1 license, but a 398B checkpoint remains operationally demanding even with quantized variants, so hosted API access is the practical starting point for most teams.

Use cases

Who Trinity-Large-Thinking is best for

The strongest fit depends on the job you need the product to complete, not the size of its feature list.

Long-running agents

Maintain reasoning and tool state across multi-step workflows where a model must plan, act, inspect results, and continue.

Tool-heavy customer operations

Orchestrate structured lookups and actions across service, telecom, travel, and other process-driven workflows.

Agentic coding

Power coding agents that need planning, command execution, repository work, and iterative verification.

Open-weight deployment

Run or customize a frontier-scale reasoning model when the organization needs control over weights and infrastructure.

Cost-sensitive reasoning APIs

Evaluate a lower-priced hosted alternative to closed frontier reasoning models for high token volumes.

Capabilities

Core Trinity-Large-Thinking features

1

Sparse 398B mixture of experts

Routes each token through four experts plus one shared expert, activating about 13B parameters rather than the full model.

2

Explicit reasoning traces

Produces extended thinking that can be returned separately from the final answer and preserved across turns.

3

Native tool calling

Supports structured tool calls for agent loops, with documented parsers and OpenAI-compatible serving patterns.

4

Long context

The checkpoint is extended to 512K tokens, though hosted providers may expose a smaller window.

5

Agent-framework compatibility

Arcee documents compatibility with OpenClaw and Hermes Agent, and recommends vLLM for agentic deployment.

6

Multiple weight formats

Official releases include the main checkpoint plus FP8, W4A16, NVFP4, and GGUF variants.

7

Permissive model license

OpenMDW-1.1 allows use, modification, redistribution, and commercialization subject to its notice and termination terms.

Process

How the Trinity-Large-Thinking workflow works

  1. Step 1

    Select hosted or self-managed access

    Prototype on Arcee Chat or OpenRouter before committing to the infrastructure required for self-hosting.

  2. Step 2

    Define narrow tools

    Give each tool a clear schema, least-privilege permissions, deterministic validation, and an explicit failure path.

  3. Step 3

    Enable reasoning correctly

    Configure the provider or vLLM parser so reasoning and final content are returned in the expected fields.

  4. Step 4

    Preserve the full assistant turn

    Append reasoning_content, content, tool calls, and tool results to message history for every agent step.

  5. Step 5

    Control context growth

    Budget for thinking tokens and remove complete older turns when needed instead of stripping recent reasoning.

  6. Step 6

    Evaluate on real trajectories

    Measure tool-selection accuracy, malformed calls, recovery behavior, task completion, latency, and total token cost.

  7. Step 7

    Gate external actions

    Require confirmation, policy checks, idempotency, and audit logs before tools create irreversible or high-impact changes.

Cost

Trinity-Large-Thinking pricing and free plan

The weights are downloadable without a model usage fee under OpenMDW-1.1, while infrastructure is separate. OpenRouter pricing varies by provider and routing; its current model page lists routed pricing around $0.22 per million input tokens, $0.85 per million output tokens, and $0.06 per million cached-read tokens.

OpenRouter routed API

$0.22 input / $0.85 output per 1M tokens

OpenRouter can route requests across available providers for price, speed, or reliability.

  • Cached reads listed at $0.06 per 1M tokens
  • Provider selection can change the exact price
  • Reasoning tokens contribute to output usage

Arcee AI provider on OpenRouter

$0.25 input / $0.80 output per 1M tokens

Pin the request to Arcee AI's current hosted provider rate when consistency matters.

  • Cached reads listed at $0.06 per 1M tokens
  • Current provider availability can change
  • OpenRouter account and billing required

Downloadable weights

No model usage fee

Run the official or quantized checkpoints on infrastructure you control.

  • OpenMDW-1.1 terms apply
  • Retain the license and applicable origin notices when redistributing
  • Compute, storage, networking, and operations costs are separate

Arcee Chat

No public rate card

Arcee links to a browser chat for trying the model, but the model card does not publish a dedicated plan price.

  • Useful for manual evaluation
  • Check the live service for current limits
  • Not a substitute for API cost testing

Pricing checked . Check current pricing at the source ↗

Assessment

Trinity-Large-Thinking strengths and limitations

Where it stands out

  • Strong focus on multi-step agents and tool use rather than generic chat alone
  • Sparse activation reduces work per token relative to a dense 398B model
  • Open weights and a permissive license support commercial customization
  • Long native context can retain substantial agent state
  • Hosted API pricing is low relative to many closed frontier reasoning models
  • Official quantized checkpoints widen deployment options
  • Detailed integration guidance explains how to preserve reasoning across turns

What to consider

  • The 398B total checkpoint is still expensive and complex to self-host
  • OpenRouter currently exposes about half the model card's 512K context window
  • Reasoning traces increase context growth, latency, storage, and output-token cost
  • Dropping reasoning_content can degrade multi-step behavior and produce malformed tool calls
  • Explicit reasoning may expose sensitive intermediate data if applications log or display it carelessly
  • Arcee's published benchmarks are point-in-time tests and do not guarantee performance in a custom agent harness
  • The model trails some closed and open competitors on several general reasoning and coding benchmarks in Arcee's own table
  • Tool calls require application-level permission checks, validation, retries, and auditability

Compare

Trinity-Large-Thinking alternatives

The right alternative depends on the specific output, workflow, controls and budget your project requires.

Consumer

GLM-5.1

Evaluate GLM-5.1 for another open model focused on long-horizon agentic coding.

Explore GLM-5.1

Consumer

Minimax M2.7

Consider MiniMax M2.7 when strong coding and agent benchmarks matter and a different hosted or open model stack is acceptable.

Explore Minimax M2.7

Agents

Kimi K2.5

Use Kimi K2.5 for an alternative open agent-focused model with its own tool-use and coding strengths.

Explore Kimi K2.5

Consumer

Claude Opus 4.6

Choose Claude Opus 4.6 when managed frontier performance and a larger commercial ecosystem matter more than open weights.

Explore Claude Opus 4.6

Questions

Trinity-Large-Thinking FAQs

What is Trinity-Large-Thinking?

It is Arcee AI's reasoning-optimized 398B sparse mixture-of-experts model for planning, coding, tool calling, and multi-step agent workflows.

How many parameters does Trinity Large Thinking use?

The model has roughly 398B total parameters and activates about 13B per token through 4-of-256 expert routing plus a shared expert.

What is its context window?

Arcee's model card lists a 512K extended context window. The current OpenRouter endpoint lists 262,144 tokens, so applications must use the provider's actual limit.

How much does the API cost?

OpenRouter currently lists routed pricing around $0.22 per million input tokens, $0.85 per million output tokens, and $0.06 per million cached-read tokens. Exact provider rates can differ.

Can I use Trinity Large Thinking commercially?

Yes. OpenMDW-1.1 is permissive and allows commercial use, subject to retaining the license and applicable origin notices on redistribution and its other terms.

Why must I preserve reasoning_content?

Arcee says the model relies on its recent thinking to continue multi-step work. Omitting it can degrade agent behavior and cause malformed tool calls.

Can I self-host it?

Yes. Arcee publishes full and quantized checkpoints with vLLM, SGLang, Transformers, and Docker guidance, but the model's total size requires serious infrastructure planning.

Is Trinity Large Thinking a multimodal model?

The official model card describes a text-generation model. Some API gateways may accept additional content formats, but do not assume native image or audio understanding without endpoint-specific documentation and tests.

Bottom line

Our Trinity-Large-Thinking verdict

Trinity-Large-Thinking is a credible open-weight option for teams building tool-heavy agents and willing to implement reasoning preservation correctly. Its low hosted price, sparse activation, permissive license, long context, and official quantizations are attractive. The main risks are operational: a huge checkpoint, provider-specific context limits, fast-growing reasoning history, and the need to secure every tool action. Benchmark it inside the real harness rather than choosing from leaderboard scores alone.

Visit Trinity-Large-Thinking website ↗
The Rundown University

AI training for the future of work.

Get access to all our AI courses, hundreds of real-world AI use cases, live expert-led workshops, an exclusive network of AI early adopters, and more.

AI Courses

Get unlimited access to all of our current & upcoming industry-specific AI courses for the duration of your subscription.

Daily Guides

To keep up with the rapid pace of AI, our team publishes AI implementation guides daily. Our library contains 300+ practical use cases to automate real-world work.

Workshops

Join weekly, live, interactive sessions with industry leaders who are at the forefront of AI for hands-on implementation guidance and exclusive insights.

Community

Network with an exclusive community of AI-first professionals who are working smarter with AI. Learn how early adopters are using AI in their work and businesses.