The Rundown AI homepage

Independent tool overview

Step-3.5-Flash at a glance

Step-3.5-Flash is StepFun's Apache-2.0 open-weight reasoning model for coding and agent workflows. Its sparse mixture-of-experts architecture has about 196.8B total parameters but activates roughly 11B per generated token, pairing a 256K context window with relatively low hosted-API pricing.

Visit the official Step-3.5-Flash site ↗
Step-3.5-Flash product preview
Model type
Sparse mixture-of-experts language model
Total parameters
196.81B
Active parameters
About 11B per generated token
Context window
256K tokens
Primary uses
Coding, reasoning, research, and agents
License
Apache 2.0
Official API price
$0.10 input / $0.30 output per 1M tokens
Review date
August 30, 2026

Overview

What Step-3.5-Flash is

Step-3.5-Flash is a text-generation foundation model optimized for tool use, coding, long-context work, and agent loops. It can be called through StepFun's OpenAI-compatible international API, used through supported third-party hosts, or self-hosted from published weights.

The model's efficiency comes from sparse activation, sliding-window attention, and multi-token prediction. Only a subset of experts runs for each token, but the deployment still has to store and serve a much larger 196B-class model. The 11B active-parameter figure should not be read as an 11B-model memory requirement.

StepFun has since published the newer Step-3.7-Flash, which adds multimodal capabilities and broader updates. Step-3.5-Flash remains available and can still make sense when an existing text, coding, or agent workload is already validated on it or when its current price and deployment support are preferable.

Use cases

Who Step-3.5-Flash is best for

The strongest fit depends on the job you need the product to complete, not the size of its feature list.

Agent backends

Power tool-using loops that need reasoning, code execution plans, and a long working context at a low token price.

Coding assistants

Support repository exploration, implementation, debugging, and terminal-oriented engineering workflows.

Long-document analysis

Process large text or code inputs within a published 256K-token context window, subject to quality testing at the intended length.

Open-weight deployment

Run or adapt published weights when a team has the substantial hardware and operations capacity required.

Cost-sensitive API workloads

Use the official hosted endpoint when its quality is sufficient and per-token economics matter more than access to the newest flagship model.

Capabilities

Core Step-3.5-Flash features

1

Sparse MoE architecture

Routes each token through eight of 288 routed experts plus a shared expert, activating about 11B parameters from the full model.

2

256K context

Uses a hybrid of sliding-window and full attention to support large codebases, documents, and accumulated agent context.

3

Multi-token prediction

Includes an MTP head intended to improve decoding throughput by predicting multiple tokens in a forward pass.

4

Agent and tool-use focus

Training and published evaluations emphasize coding, terminal work, browsing, research, and multi-step task execution.

5

OpenAI-compatible API

The international StepFun endpoint works with common Chat Completions clients using the model ID step-3.5-flash.

6

Open weights

Weights, technical material, deployment recipes, quantized variants, and integration examples are publicly available under Apache 2.0.

7

Tool integrations

Official guides cover agent and coding tools including OpenClaw, Claude Code, Codex CLI, Roo Code, Kilo Code, and others.

Process

How the Step-3.5-Flash workflow works

  1. Step 1

    Choose hosted or self-hosted

    Start with the official API for fast evaluation; consider local or dedicated deployment only when privacy, customization, or scale justifies the infrastructure.

  2. Step 2

    Create a representative test set

    Include actual codebases, tools, languages, context lengths, failure cases, and output constraints from the intended workflow.

  3. Step 3

    Connect through a supported protocol

    Use StepFun's OpenAI-compatible endpoint or a documented integration, store the API key server-side, and pin the intended model ID.

  4. Step 4

    Implement tool boundaries

    Validate arguments, sandbox code, restrict credentials and filesystem access, and require approval for consequential actions.

  5. Step 5

    Measure the full trajectory

    Track not only token price but reasoning length, tool calls, latency, retries, completion rate, and human correction time.

  6. Step 6

    Compare with newer models

    Re-run the same evaluations against Step-3.7-Flash and other current candidates before standardizing on an older model generation.

Cost

Step-3.5-Flash pricing and free plan

The model weights are available under Apache 2.0, but self-hosting still incurs hardware and operations costs. StepFun's international pay-as-you-go API lists Step-3.5-Flash at $0.10 per 1M uncached input tokens, $0.02 per 1M cached input tokens, and $0.30 per 1M output tokens. Step Plan subscriptions offer quota-based access for high-frequency agent and coding use.

Open weights

No model license fee

Download and deploy under Apache 2.0 while paying the resulting infrastructure and operations costs.

  • Full and quantized weights are available
  • 196B-class storage and memory requirements remain material
  • Serving performance depends heavily on hardware and runtime
  • Security, scaling, and monitoring are self-managed

Pay-as-you-go API

$0.10 input / $0.30 output per 1M tokens

Official hosted inference through StepFun's international platform.

  • Cached input: $0.02 per 1M tokens
  • No infrastructure to operate
  • Rate limits depend on account tier and funding
  • Actual cost depends on reasoning and output length

Step Plan Flash Mini

$6.99

Entry subscription for supported agent and coding integrations.

  • 100 prompts per 5-hour window
  • 400 prompts per week
  • A prompt is a quota unit, not necessarily one API request
  • StepFun estimates roughly 15–20 requests per prompt

Step Plan Flash Plus

$9.99

Higher quota for daily productivity.

  • 400 prompts per 5-hour window
  • 1,600 prompts per week
  • Supports Step-3.5-Flash and the 2603 variant
  • Quota conversion reflects context and tool usage

Step Plan Flash Pro

$29

Higher-volume plan for heavy agent use.

  • 1,500 prompts per 5-hour window
  • 6,000 prompts per week
  • Designed for more intensive coding and agent workflows
  • Plan availability and terms should be checked before purchase

Step Plan Flash Max

$99

Largest published Step Plan quota for professional workloads.

  • 5,000 prompts per 5-hour window
  • 20,000 prompts per week
  • StepFun estimates up to roughly 300,000 requests per week
  • Not a guarantee that every workload will reach the estimate

Pricing checked . Check current pricing at the source ↗

Assessment

Step-3.5-Flash strengths and limitations

Where it stands out

  • Low official API pricing for a reasoning and agent-oriented model
  • Apache-2.0 weights permit self-hosting and modification
  • Large 256K context window for code and document-heavy tasks
  • Sparse architecture activates a small fraction of total parameters per token
  • Official guides cover common coding assistants and agent frameworks
  • StepFun explicitly documents several known behavioral weaknesses

What to consider

  • A 196B-class model remains demanding to store and serve even though about 11B parameters are active per token
  • StepFun says the model can use longer reasoning trajectories than some peers, reducing the savings implied by headline token rates
  • The vendor notes instability in specialized domains and long-horizon multi-turn conversations, including repetition, mixed languages, and time or identity inconsistency
  • Published throughput and benchmark figures depend on hardware, serving configuration, harnesses, and vendor methodology
  • It is a text model; the newer Step-3.7-Flash is the more relevant StepFun candidate when multimodal input is required
  • Open weights do not provide a finished safety layer, agent sandbox, monitoring stack, or production service-level agreement

Compare

Step-3.5-Flash alternatives

The right alternative depends on the specific output, workflow, controls and budget your project requires.

Consumer

GLM-5-Turbo

A newer high-speed agentic model positioned specifically for OpenClaw and similar long-running tool workflows.

Explore GLM-5-Turbo

Coding

Qwen3-Coder-Next

A more compact open-weight option designed around agentic coding when local deployment size matters.

Explore Qwen3-Coder-Next

Business Operations

DeepSeek

A broader open-model ecosystem with hosted chat and API options for reasoning, coding, and general-purpose workloads.

Explore DeepSeek

Questions

Step-3.5-Flash FAQs

Is Step-3.5-Flash open source?

StepFun publishes the weights and repository under the Apache 2.0 license. Teams should still review the license and any third-party dependencies or datasets relevant to their deployment.

What does 196B total and 11B active parameters mean?

The model contains about 196.8B parameters, but its router selects a subset of experts so roughly 11B participate in generating each token. That reduces computation; it does not shrink the full weight set to an 11B model.

Can Step-3.5-Flash run locally?

Yes, official full and quantized releases support local deployment, and StepFun gives examples using high-end consumer or compact AI hardware. Memory, storage, speed, and context capacity still depend on the quantization and machine.

How much does the StepFun API cost?

The international platform currently lists $0.10 per 1M uncached input tokens, $0.02 per 1M cached input tokens, and $0.30 per 1M output tokens for Step-3.5-Flash. Reasoning length can materially affect the effective cost of a task.

Does Step-3.5-Flash support a 256K context window?

Yes, the official specification lists 256K. Long-context support is a capacity claim, not proof that accuracy stays constant across every position or task, so evaluate it at the lengths you actually need.

Is Step-3.5-Flash good for coding agents?

Coding and agent workflows are its main positioning, and StepFun publishes integrations and benchmark results for them. Production selection should still use repository-specific tests, tool-call completion rates, security checks, and total task cost.

Should I use Step-3.5-Flash or Step-3.7-Flash?

Test both. Step-3.7-Flash is newer and multimodal, while Step-3.5-Flash remains a low-cost, text-focused option with established deployment recipes. The better choice depends on accuracy, modality, latency, compatibility, and cost in the actual workflow.

Bottom line

Our Step-3.5-Flash verdict

Step-3.5-Flash remains an attractive open-weight engine for cost-sensitive coding and agent experiments, especially through the inexpensive official API. Its sparse design is efficient but does not make self-hosting trivial, and StepFun's own known-issues section is a useful warning against trusting long, specialized agent runs without supervision. Evaluate it beside Step-3.7-Flash and current peers before committing a new production stack.

Visit Step-3.5-Flash website ↗
The Rundown University

AI training for the future of work.

Get access to all our AI courses, hundreds of real-world AI use cases, live expert-led workshops, an exclusive network of AI early adopters, and more.

AI Courses

Get unlimited access to all of our current & upcoming industry-specific AI courses for the duration of your subscription.

Daily Guides

To keep up with the rapid pace of AI, our team publishes AI implementation guides daily. Our library contains 300+ practical use cases to automate real-world work.

Workshops

Join weekly, live, interactive sessions with industry leaders who are at the forefront of AI for hands-on implementation guidance and exclusive insights.

Community

Network with an exclusive community of AI-first professionals who are working smarter with AI. Learn how early adopters are using AI in their work and businesses.