Application-security teams
Prioritize likely exploitable findings, review trends across repositories, and apply centralized security policies without handing developers a raw scanner backlog.
Independent tool overview
DryRun Security is an AI-native application-security platform that reviews pull requests and repositories with codebase context, prioritizes exploitable risk, and enforces custom policies written in natural language.
Visit the official DryRun Security site ↗.png&w=3840&q=75)
Overview
DryRun Security is built for engineering and AppSec teams that want security feedback inside the software-development workflow. It connects to GitHub or GitLab, analyzes pull requests alongside relevant codebase context, and returns focused findings with explanations and remediation guidance. Its Contextual Security Analysis approach is designed to reason about data flow, authorization boundaries, business logic, and exploitability instead of relying only on pattern matching.
The platform combines continuous PR review with DeepScan full-repository analysis, natural-language Custom Code Policies, merge-blocking controls, a central risk register, and programmatic access through an API and MCP integrations. It is a serious team product rather than a lightweight developer utility: pricing is quote-based, source-code access and data handling require security review, and AI-generated findings still need human validation before teams treat them as proven vulnerabilities or safe fixes.
Use cases
The strongest fit depends on the job you need the product to complete, not the size of its feature list.
Prioritize likely exploitable findings, review trends across repositories, and apply centralized security policies without handing developers a raw scanner backlog.
Add an independent security-review layer for human- and AI-generated changes from tools such as Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, and Copilot.
Turn internal architecture, compliance, and secure-coding requirements into natural-language policies that run on every pull request.
Use DeepScan to establish a full-repository risk baseline instead of analyzing only changes made after installation.
Return focused comments, checks, and fix guidance where developers already review code, with configurable gates for higher-risk findings.
Capabilities
Builds a model of architecture, routes, authentication, data flow, code relationships, and Git behavior to evaluate findings in application context.
Looks for injection, authorization, IDOR, logic, secrets, and other code risks while considering reachability, likelihood, and impact.
Runs when pull requests are opened or updated and posts code-referenced findings, explanations, and remediation guidance into the review workflow.
Analyzes an entire repository on demand or on a schedule to find accumulated and cross-file risks that a diff-only scan can miss.
Lets teams describe security, architecture, compliance, or process requirements in plain English and enforce up to seven policies per repository.
Supports severity thresholds plus analyzer- and policy-specific status checks that can be required through source-control branch protection.
Centralizes findings, triage state, repository visibility, daily insights, and security trends for engineering and security owners.
Maps GitHub and GitLab roles into account permissions, limiting developer visibility to repositories they can already access while reserving configuration controls for admins.
Provides programmatic access to repositories, scans, analyzers, policies, findings, and insights, with integrations for AI coding tools and assistants.
The product lists support for major stacks including Python, JavaScript, TypeScript, Java, C#, Ruby, Go, C++, PHP, Kotlin, Swift, Scala, and more.
Includes checks for Terraform configurations, with Custom Code Policies available for additional infrastructure requirements.
Connects scanning to source-control workflows and can route notifications and security collaboration into Slack.
Process
Step 1
Install DryRun Security for the appropriate GitHub or GitLab organization and grant access only to the repositories in scope.
Step 2
Run DeepScan on important repositories to identify pre-existing risks that will not appear in future pull-request diffs.
Step 3
Choose repositories, enable the relevant security agents, set notification behavior, and decide which findings should appear in review comments.
Step 4
Draft and test natural-language policies against recent code, then attach the validated policies to repository configurations.
Step 5
Start new checks in silent mode, review false positives and missed context, then add severity-based or policy-specific blocking where confidence is high.
Step 6
Have developers and security owners validate findings, apply fixes, and use the risk register, trends, API, or MCP integrations to track follow-through.
Cost
DryRun Security does not publish fixed plan prices. Its FAQ says pricing is aligned with the number of developers, security-team members, and owners who need codebase visibility, so organizations need a custom quote and should confirm included repositories, scans, policies, integrations, support, and contract minimums.
Contact sales
SaaS pricing based on the size of the engineering and security teams using the platform and the owners who require codebase visibility.
Pricing checked . Check current pricing at the source ↗
Assessment
Compare
The right alternative depends on the specific output, workflow, controls and budget your project requires.
Agents
Consider Codex Security if you want OpenAI's repository threat modeling, vulnerability validation, and patch proposals and already qualify for its research preview.
Explore Codex Security →Coding
Consider Claude Security if your team is centered on Anthropic and wants scheduled repository scans, patch generation, and security-workflow exports.
Explore Claude Security →Coding
Consider Claude Code Review when the broader need is multi-agent pull-request review rather than a dedicated AppSec platform with policy enforcement and a risk register.
Explore Claude Code Review →Questions
DryRun Security is an AI-native application-security platform for contextual pull-request reviews, full-repository scans, custom code policies, risk tracking, and remediation guidance across human- and AI-generated code.
DryRun Security does not publish fixed prices. Its FAQ says pricing is aligned with the number of developers, security-team members, and owners using the platform, so buyers need a custom quote.
Yes. Official product and documentation pages describe GitHub and GitLab integrations for installation, pull-request analysis, role mapping, comments, and status checks.
It is DryRun Security's approach to evaluating code with surrounding architecture, data flow, authorization, Git history, frameworks, and application behavior so findings can be prioritized by likely exploitability and impact.
PR Review analyzes incoming code changes and provides fast feedback in the pull request. DeepScan analyzes the complete repository to find existing or cross-cutting risks that may not appear in one diff.
Yes. Teams can configure a severity threshold or specific analyzer and policy checks, then require the corresponding DryRun status checks through branch-protection rules.
Yes. Custom Code Policies express requirements in natural language, can be tested before rollout, and can run on every pull request. Current documentation says up to seven policies can be attached per repository.
The vendor says it analyzes repositories and stores contextual markers rather than source code, and that access remains controlled through GitHub or GitLab. Organizations should still verify current data flows, subprocessors, retention, model usage, and contract terms during security review.
No. It can improve code-review coverage and prioritization, but static and AI-assisted analysis cannot prove an application is secure. High-risk systems still need layered testing, threat modeling, dependency controls, runtime monitoring, and expert review.
Bottom line
DryRun Security is most compelling for AppSec teams that need contextual security review embedded in pull requests, plus repository-wide baselines and organization-specific policy enforcement. The combination of DeepScan, natural-language policies, merge controls, and centralized risk visibility is broader than a simple AI reviewer. The purchasing decision should hinge on a proof of value using representative repositories: measure true-positive rate, missed issues, review latency, developer acceptance, and total quoted cost before allowing the system to block merges.
Visit DryRun Security website ↗
Get access to all our AI courses, hundreds of real-world AI use cases, live expert-led workshops, an exclusive network of AI early adopters, and more.
Get unlimited access to all of our current & upcoming industry-specific AI courses for the duration of your subscription.
To keep up with the rapid pace of AI, our team publishes AI implementation guides daily. Our library contains 300+ practical use cases to automate real-world work.
Join weekly, live, interactive sessions with industry leaders who are at the forefront of AI for hands-on implementation guidance and exclusive insights.
Network with an exclusive community of AI-first professionals who are working smarter with AI. Learn how early adopters are using AI in their work and businesses.